4.6 Article

Stability and Rupture of Liquid Crystal Bridges under Microgravity

Journal

CRYSTALS
Volume 12, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cryst12081092

Keywords

smectic liquid-crystals; Rayleigh-Plateau instability; TEXUS suborbital rocket; microgravity

Funding

  1. German Aerospace Center (DLR) [50WM1430, 50WM1744, 50WM2054]
  2. German Science Foundation (DFG) [STA 425-40/3]
  3. Book Processing Charge by the Open Access Publication Fund of Magdeburg University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Liquid-crystal columns were prepared and observed under microgravity conditions during suborbital rocket flights. The collapse of the columns was observed in the isotropic and nematic phases, but they survived in the smectic A and C mesophases due to the different yield stress of the material. The research provides important experimental data for understanding the behavior of liquid-crystal materials in microgravity.
Liquid-crystal columns were prepared and observed under microgravity aboard suborbital TEXUS rocket flights. The microgravity phase of each flight lasted for approximately six minutes. We tested structures in different liquid-crystalline mesophases. In the isotropic and nematic phases, the Rayleigh-Plateau instability led to the collapse of the columns. However, in the smectic A and C mesophases, it was found that the columns survived the extension to slenderness ratios (length/diameter) of over 4.5 (and in one case, more than 6). The liquid-crystalline material in the millimeter-sized columns was macroscopically disordered. Thus, regular shell-like internal layer structures that stabilized the columns can be excluded. Instead, the reason for their persistence was the yield stress of the material, which is quite different for the different mesophases. In the columnar mesophase, the cylindrical bridge even survived the strong deceleration when the rocket re-entered the atmosphere. During the breakup of the filaments, the neck thinning dynamics were determined.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available