4.6 Article

Genome-Wide Analysis Identifies Candidate Genes Encoding Beak Color of Duck

Journal

GENES
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/genes13071271

Keywords

duck; beak color; GWAS; melanin

Funding

  1. Postgraduate Research and Innovation in Jiangsu Province [KYCX21_3258]
  2. China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA [CARS-42]
  3. Jiangsu Agricultural Industry Technology System [JATS [2021]326]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study identified candidate genes and potential SNPs associated with yellow, black, and spotted beaks in ducks. MITF, EDNRB2, members of the POU family, and the SLC superfamily were found to be candidate genes regulating pigmentation. The study provides new insights into the genetic factors influencing beak color diversity.
Beak color diversity is a broadly occurring phenomenon in birds. Here, we used ducks to identify candidate genes for yellow, black, and spotted beaks. For this, an F-2 population consisting of 275 ducks was genotyped using whole genome resequencing containing 12.6 M single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and three beak colors. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) was used to identify the candidate and potential SNPs for three beak colors in ducks (yellow, spotted, and black). The results showed that 2753 significant SNPs were associated with black beaks, 7462 with yellow, and 17 potential SNPs with spotted beaks. Based on SNP annotation, MITF, EDNRB2, members of the POU family, and the SLC superfamily were the candidate genes regulating pigmentation. Meanwhile, isoforms MITF-M and EDNRB2 were significantly different between black and yellow beaks. MITF and EDNRB2 likely play a synergistic role in the regulation of melanin synthesis, and their mutations contribute to phenotypic differences in beak melanin deposition among individuals. This study provides new insights into genetic factors that may influence the diversity of beak color.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available