4.6 Review

Pathogenesis of sarcopenia in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 13, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.850964

Keywords

COPD; sarcopenia; pathogenic factors; pathogenesis; treatment

Categories

Funding

  1. Joint construction project of medical science and technology in Henan Province [LHGJ20190206]
  2. Key Research Projects of Ordinary Institution of Higher Education in Henan Province [20A320058]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

COPD is a common pulmonary disease characterized by persistent respiratory symptoms and airflow obstruction. It is often associated with other organ diseases, including sarcopenia. Multiple factors, such as inflammation, oxidative stress, nutritional changes, aging, and medication use, can contribute to muscle dysfunction in COPD patients.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common pulmonary disease characterized by persistent respiratory symptoms and airflow obstruction. In addition to lung diseases, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is often associated with other organ diseases, and sarcopenia is one of the common diseases. In recent years, multiple factors have been proposed to influence muscle dysfunction in COPD patients, including systemic and local inflammation, oxidative stress, hypoxia, hypercapnia, protein synthesis, catabolic imbalance, nutritional changes, disuse, ageing, and the use of medications such as steroids. These factors alone or in combination can lead to a reduction in muscle mass and cross-sectional area, deterioration of muscle bioenergy metabolism, defects in muscle repair and regeneration mechanisms, apoptosis and other anatomical and/or functional pathological changes, resulting in a decrease in the muscle's ability to work. This article reviews the research progress of possible pathogenesis of sarcopenia in COPD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available