4.6 Article

Foxa2 and Pet1 Direct and Indirect Synergy Drive Serotonergic Neuronal Differentiation

Journal

FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 16, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.903881

Keywords

neuronal differentiation; direct programming methods; Pet1; Foxa2; stem cell differentiation; transcription factor

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH [R35GM144135]
  2. NIH/NIA [5R21AG067174]
  3. ERC [StG-2011-281920, Co-2020-101002203, PID2020-115635RB-I00]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Forced expression of transcription factors (TFs) can program neuronal fate, but the mechanisms underlying TF coordination and control of distinct neuronal fates are still unclear. Using neuronal programming of embryonic stem cells, this study found that the addition of TFs can redirect neuron fate. Specifically, the TF combination of Ascl1-Lmx1b-Foxa2-Pet1 leads to a diffuse monoaminergic fate. The pioneer factor Foxa2 represses Phox2b to induce serotonergic fate, and Foxa2 and Pet1 synergistically upregulate serotonergic fate.
Neuronal programming by forced expression of transcription factors (TFs) holds promise for clinical applications of regenerative medicine. However, the mechanisms by which TFs coordinate their activities on the genome and control distinct neuronal fates remain obscure. Using direct neuronal programming of embryonic stem cells, we dissected the contribution of a series of TFs to specific neuronal regulatory programs. We deconstructed the Ascl1-Lmx1b-Foxa2-Pet1 TF combination that has been shown to generate serotonergic neurons and found that stepwise addition of TFs to Ascl1 canalizes the neuronal fate into a diffuse monoaminergic fate. The addition of pioneer factor Foxa2 represses Phox2b to induce serotonergic fate, similar to in vivo regulatory networks. Foxa2 and Pet1 appear to act synergistically to upregulate serotonergic fate. Foxa2 and Pet1 co-bind to a small fraction of genomic regions but mostly bind to different regulatory sites. In contrast to the combinatorial binding activities of other programming TFs, Pet1 does not strictly follow the Foxa2 pioneer. These findings highlight the challenges in formulating generalizable rules for describing the behavior of TF combinations that program distinct neuronal subtypes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available