In praise of triads

The article begins with a response to a recent contribution by Jensen, in which he has criticized several aspects of the use of triads of elements, including Dobereiner's original introduction of the concept and the modern use of atomic number triads by some authors including myself. Such triads are groups of three elements, one of which has approximately the average atomic weight of the other two elements, as well as having intermediate chemical reactivity. I also examine Jensen's attempted reconstruction Mendeleev's use of triads in predicting the atomic weights of three hitherto unknown elements, that were subsequently named gallium, germanium and scandium. The present article then considers the use of atomic number triads, in conjunction with the phenomenon of first member anomaly, in order to offer support for Janet's left-step periodic table, in which helium is relocated into group 2 of the table. Such a table features triads in which the 2nd and third elements of each group, without fail, fall into periods of equal length, a feature that is absent in the conventional 18-column or the conventional 32-column table. The dual sense of the term element, which is the source of much discussion in the philosophy of chemistry, is alluded to in further support of such a relocation of helium that may at first appear to contradict chemical intuition.

Automated summary

This article responds to Jensen's critique of the use of triads of elements. It explores Mendeleev's use of triads and the modern use of atomic number triads. The article argues in support of Janet's left-step periodic table, using atomic number triads and the phenomenon of first member anomaly. The article also mentions the dual sense of the term element in the philosophy of chemistry.