4.2 Article

Clinical characteristics of medically hospitalized youth with anorexia nervosa/atypical anorexia nervosa and premorbid overweight/obesity

Journal

EATING DISORDERS
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages 201-211

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10640266.2022.2097361

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Youth with anorexia nervosa or atypical anorexia nervosa and premorbid overweight/obesity are vulnerable to diagnostic delays. This study found that patients in this subset, regardless of weight category, had similar characteristics when relying on historical records.
Youth with anorexia nervosa (AN) or atypical anorexia nervosa (AAN) and premorbid overweight/obesity are particularly vulnerable to diagnostic delays, yet research about this patient subset is lacking. This study aimed to compare mental health and demographic characteristics of patients with AN/AAN and premorbid overweight/obesity to patients with premorbid normal weight. Retrospective chart review identified 253 patients (aged 10-22) hospitalized for medical complications of AN/AAN between 2013 and 2020, including 29.6% (n = 75) with and 70.4% (n = 178) without premorbid overweight/obesity. Analyses revealed that patients with AN/AAN and premorbid overweight/obesity were more often cisgender male (24% vs. 8.4%), diagnosed with AAN (62.7% vs. 32%), and had lost a greater percent of body weight (29% vs. 16.4%) than premorbid normal weight counterparts. No significant differences were found for illness duration (10.1 months vs 9.3 months), psychiatric comorbidities (42.7% vs. 32.2%) or psychotropic medication use (25.3% vs. 19.2%), past mental health treatment (44.6% vs. 37.5%), or family history of eating disorders (22.7% vs. 20.8%). Our findings suggest that when relying on historical records, patients hospitalized for medical complications of AN/AAN have similar characteristics across the weight spectrum.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available