4.5 Article

Risk Assessment for Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis Using Polygenic Risk Scores

Journal

ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY
Volume 74, Issue 9, Pages 1488-1496

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/art.42246

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam
  2. Erasmus University, Rotterdam
  3. Netherlands Organization for the Health Research and Development (ZonMw)
  4. Research Institute for Diseases in the Elderly (RIDE)
  5. Ministry of Education, Culture and Science
  6. Ministry for Health, Welfare and Sports
  7. European Commission (DG XII)
  8. Municipality of Rotterdam

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the association between polygenic risk scores (PRS) and hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA) using data from population-based and clinical cohorts. The results showed a stronger association between PRS and clinically defined OA compared to radiographic OA phenotypes, with the highest risk stratification observed for total hip replacement (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR). These findings suggest that PRS-based risk assessment could play a role in preventing OA, but further studies are needed to test its integration in diverse healthcare settings.
Objective Polygenic risk scores (PRS) allow risk stratification using common single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), and clinical applications are currently explored for several diseases. This study was undertaken to assess the risk of hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA) using PRS. Methods We analyzed 12,732 individuals from a population-based cohort from the Rotterdam Study (n = 11,496), a clinical cohort (Cohort Hip and Cohort Knee [CHECK] study; n = 908), and a high-risk cohort of overweight women (Prevention of Knee OA in Overweight Females [PROOF] study; n = 328), for the association of the PRS with prevalence/incidence of radiographic OA, of clinical OA, and of total hip replacement (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR). The hip PRS and knee PRS contained 44 and 24 independent SNPs, respectively, and were derived from a recent genome-wide association study meta-analysis. Standardized PRS (with Z transformation) were used in all analyses. Results We found a stronger association of the PRS for clinically defined OA compared to radiographic OA phenotypes, and we observed the highest PRS risk stratification for TKR/THR. The odds ratio (OR) per SD was 1.3 for incident THR (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.1-1.5) and 1.6 (95% CI 1.3-1.9) for incident TKR in the Rotterdam Study. The knee PRS was associated with incident clinical knee OA in the CHECK study (OR 1.3 [95% CI 1.1-1.5]), but not for the PROOF study (OR 1.2 [95% CI 0.8-1.7]). The OR for OA increased gradually across the PRS distribution, up to 2.1 (95% CI 1.4-3.2) for individuals with the 10% highest PRS compared to the middle 50% of the PRS distribution. Conclusion Our findings validated the association of PRS across OA definitions. Since OA is becoming frequent and primary prevention is not commonly applicable, PRS-based risk assessment could play a role in OA prevention. However, the utility of PRS is dependent on the setting. Further studies are needed to test the integration of genetic risk assessment in diverse health care settings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available