4.7 Review

Oxytocin-based therapies for treatment of Prader-Willi and Schaaf-Yang syndromes: evidence, disappointments, and future research strategies

Journal

TRANSLATIONAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41398-022-02054-1

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. DFG [GR 3619/13-1, GR 3619/15-1, GR 3619/16-1, TRG (GRK) 2174]
  2. SFB Consortium [1158-2]
  3. FPWR
  4. Prader-Willi France
  5. ANR Pradox

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Intranasal oxytocin treatment for autism spectrum disorder has faced setbacks despite early promising results, leading to uncertainty in its effectiveness for related syndromes. The critical period theory proposed could shed light on the varying efficacy of oxytocin-based treatment in infants versus adolescents.
The prosocial neuropeptide oxytocin is being developed as a potential treatment for various neuropsychiatric disorders including autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Early studies using intranasal oxytocin in patients with ASD yielded encouraging results and for some time, scientists and affected families placed high hopes on the use of intranasal oxytocin for behavioral therapy in ASD. However, a recent Phase III trial obtained negative results using intranasal oxytocin for the treatment of behavioral symptoms in children with ASD. Given the frequently observed autism-like behavioral phenotypes in Prader-Willi and Schaaf-Yang syndromes, it is unclear whether oxytocin treatment represents a viable option to treat behavioral symptoms in these diseases. Here we review the latest findings on intranasal OT treatment, Prader-Willi and Schaaf-Yang syndromes, and propose novel research strategies for tailored oxytocin-based therapies for affected individuals. Finally, we propose the critical period theory, which could explain why oxytocin-based treatment seems to be most efficient in infants, but not adolescents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available