4.5 Article

Fractional View Analysis of Kuramoto-Sivashinsky Equations with Non-Singular Kernel Operators

Journal

SYMMETRY-BASEL
Volume 14, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/sym14071463

Keywords

Caputo-Fabrizio and Atangana-Baleanu operators; Adomian decomposition method; natural transform; fractional Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equations

Funding

  1. Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia [PNURSP2022R183]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this article, the authors investigate the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation, a nonlinear model describing various physical and chemical phenomena. They propose a novel technique called the natural decomposition method, combined with fractional derivatives, to obtain an approximate analytical solution for this equation. The results show that this method is efficient, simple, and accurate in studying nonlinear models in science and technology.
In this article, we investigate the nonlinear model describing the various physical and chemical phenomena named the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation. We implemented the natural decomposition method, a novel technique, mixed with the Caputo-Fabrizio (CF) and Atangana-Baleanu deriavatives in Caputo manner (ABC) fractional derivatives for obtaining the approximate analytical solution of the fractional Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation (FKS). The proposed method gives a series form solution which converges quickly towards the exact solution. To show the accuracy of the proposed method, we examine three different cases. We presented proposed method results by means of graphs and tables to ensure proposed method validity. Further, the behavior of the achieved results for the fractional order is also presented. The results we obtain by implementing the proposed method shows that our technique is extremely efficient and simple to investigate the behaviour of nonlinear models found in science and technology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available