Journal
SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 14, Issue 15, Pages -Publisher
MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su14159204
Keywords
self-propelled sprayer; spray characteristics; field efficiency; spraying cost
Funding
- Higher Education Commission (HEC), Islamabad [NRPU-7583]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
In most Asian countries, farmers have smallholdings and traditional tractor-mounted boom sprayers are not practical. Therefore, a prototype self-propelled crop sprayer was developed, which has shown good spray characteristics and lower spraying cost in laboratory and field tests.
In most Asian countries, farmers have smallholdings ranging from one to two hectares. The tractor-mounted boom sprayers cannot practically be used in small size farms with divided plots and complex terrain. To cope with these issues, a prototype self-propelled crop sprayer was developed, including a 20-hp engine, 300 L liquid tank, and hydraulically-controlled spray boom with eight hollow cone nozzles. The spray symmetry of the hollow cone nozzle was evaluated under four pressures (2.5, 3, 3.5, and 4 bar) in the laboratory. The operating parameters of the sprayer, such as forward speed (4, 6, and 8 km h(-1)), spray height (40, 55, and 70 cm), and pressure (3, 5, and 7 bar) were optimized by measuring three spray characteristics including droplet density, coverage percentage, and Volume Median Diameter (VMD) in the cotton field. The results revealed that the nozzle spray was symmetrical at 2.5 and 3 bar pressure as the R-2 value was higher than 0.96. The field test result showed that in all treatments, treatments T14 (6 km h(-1), 55 cm, 5 bar) and T22 (8 km h(-1), 55 cm, 3 bar) were suitable for spraying medium-to-low concentration solution (post-emergence herbicides and fungicides) and high concentration solution (insecticides and pre-emergence herbicides), respectively. The spray characteristics at treatments T14 and T22 were 64.7 droplets cm(-2), 26.7%, 230 mu m, and 39 droplets cm(-2), 14.9%, and 219.8 mu m respectively. The field efficiency of the sprayer was 61%. The spraying cost per unit area was 55-64% less compared to manual labor cost. In conclusion, a prototype self-propelled crop sprayer is an efficient and environment-friendly technology for small farms. Operating the sprayer at the optimal parameters also saves operational costs and time.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available