4.6 Article

Assessment of the Impact of Using a Smart Thermostat and Smart Meter Data on a Whole-Building Energy Simulation

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 14, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su14106299

Keywords

building energy simulation model; model tuning; smart thermostat data; smart meter data; smart greenhouse buildings

Funding

  1. Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP)
  2. Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE) of the Republic of Korea [20212020800050]
  3. ASHRAE
  4. Texas Emissions Reduction Program (TERP)
  5. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20212020800050] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper examines the effectiveness of tuning a residential building energy simulation model using measured data from a smart thermostat and smart meter. The results show that adjusting input parameters can improve the accuracy of the simulation, with the simulated indoor temperatures and whole-building energy use matching the measured data within acceptable ranges.
Building energy simulation models have been used to assist the design and/or optimization of buildings energy performance. The results from building energy simulation models can be more reliable when measured energy use data, indoor environmental condition data, system operation status, and coincident weather data are used to validate the simulation results. In this paper, given the wide-spread use of home automation devices in residential buildings, we studied how well a residential building energy simulation model can be tuned using measured interval data from a smart thermostat and smart meter. The analysis is based on a multi-stage approach that can help improve the reliability of the use of building energy simulation models that reflect both the indoor air temperature and whole-building energy use. Results from changing the input parameters in the building simulation show that the comparison of the simulated and measured indoor temperatures fall in a range below a NMBE of 1.5% and a CV-RMSE of 2.2%, while the simulated whole-building energy use matches the measured energy use below a NMBE of -2.7% and a CV-RMSE of 10.9%. We found that the most significant parameters for the indoor air temperature and whole-building energy use were the effective U-value for the slab-on-grade floor and the heating and cooling system operation status, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available