4.6 Article

Development of a Multiobjective Automatic Parameter-Calibration Framework for Urban Drainage Systems

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 14, Issue 14, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su14148350

Keywords

urban drainage systems; stormwater management model; multiobjective automatic parameter-calibration framework; UDS modeling sustainability

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korean government (MSIT) [NRF-2021R1A5A1032433]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a multiobjective automatic parameter-calibration framework based on the stormwater management model (SWMM) was developed to improve the sustainability of urban drainage systems (UDSs). The proposed framework was verified using the Yongdap drainage network in Seoul, South Korea, and showed its effectiveness in reflecting system characteristics and problems in UDS design, planning, and management.
Urban drainage systems (UDSs) continue to face challenges, despite numerous efforts to improve their sustainability through design, planning, and management. The goal of such initiatives is to avoid and minimize flooding as well as maintain the UDS's sustainable functionality, which can be analyzed using a stormwater management model (SWMM). In this study, a multiobjective automatic parameter-calibration (MAPC) framework was developed based on the SWMM. It consisted of three steps: sensitivity analysis (Step I), objective selection (Step II), and SWMM parameter calibration (Step III). The proposed MAPC framework was verified using the Yongdap drainage network located in Seoul, South Korea. The resultant MAPC framework demonstrated that the system characteristics (such as percent of impervious area and hillslope) and problems in UDS design, planning, and management can be well reflected by the corresponding model. The MAPC framework proposed in this study can contribute to UDS modeling sustainability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available