4.6 Article

The Dynamic Effects of Urban-Rural Income Inequality on Sustainable Economic Growth under Urbanization and Monetary Policy in China

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su14116896

Keywords

income inequality; economic growth; urbanization; monetary policy; TVP-VAR model; policy rebalancing

Funding

  1. Major Program of the National Social Science Fund of China [20ZD081]
  2. General Program of the National Social Science Fund of China [09BJL015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Income inequality in China has worsened since the 1970s, with urban-rural income disparity playing a significant role. Urbanization policy and monetary policy are important tools for the Chinese government to address this issue. Research has shown that the impact of urban-rural income inequality on economic growth is time-varying, initially promoting growth but later hindering it. Currently, urbanization helps alleviate inequality and promotes growth, while loose monetary policy exacerbates inequality and negatively affects long-term growth. It is suggested that policy rebalancing, such as proactive urbanization policy and prudent monetary policy, should be considered to ensure the sustainability of economic development.
Income inequality in China has become increasingly serious since the beginning of the economic reform period in the 1970s, with urban-rural income inequality playing a large role. Urbanization policy and monetary policy are currently important economic policy tools for the Chinese government. In order to investigate the influence of inequality on the economy and to provide recommendations for ensuring the sustainability of growth, we study the effect of urban-rural income inequality on economic growth in the context of urbanization and monetary policy in China between 2002 and 2021. Using a flexible time-varying parametric structural vector auto-regression (TVP-VAR) model and a robust Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm, our empirical results show that the effect is time-varying, with inequality promoting growth in the early years but affecting it adversely at later stages. Currently, urbanization mitigates inequality and promotes growth simultaneously, while easy monetary policy worsens inequality and affects growth adversely in the long term. We suggest that the authorities need to consider the implementation of policy rebalancing to ensure that the sustainability of economic development is not jeopardized because of worsening income disparity. Proactive urbanization policy and prudent monetary policy are viable rebalancing options.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available