4.6 Article

Reimagining Food: Readdressing and Respecting Values

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su14127328

Keywords

food; alter-values; non-financial; value; typology; intrinsic; production-related; supply chain; emotio-cultural

Funding

  1. John Oldacre Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The values associated with food are constructed by market-based systems. This paper introduces a new typology, alter-values, to support a more holistic and sustainable food system. By changing the food environment and focusing on intrinsic and emotio-cultural values, it is possible to challenge and alter the structure of the conventional food system.
The values associated with food are framed and constructed by market-based systems that assign attributes to different foods across the marketplace. The aim of the paper was to conceptualize the range of non-financial aspects associated with food in the literature examined and a typology was introduced to position a new set of non-financial food values, the alter-values, which support the creation of a more holistic approach to visualize and reimagine a more sustainable, resilient food system that readdresses and respects such values. The four alter-values of interest, intrinsic, production-related, supply chain related, and emotio-cultural values, were discussed in the context of changing food environments, and a visualization of the typology was presented to explain them. By focusing especially on intrinsic and emotio-cultural values, an adaptation of the current food environment beyond pecuniary-based emphasis was possible. Such an approach helps to challenge the structure of the conventional food system towards a more citizen-driven sustainable model, altering priorities, with a drive towards embedding values and going beyond perceiving food only in terms of exchange value, to considering food as a vital aspect of life.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available