4.5 Article

Infants later diagnosed with autism have lower canonical babbling ratios in the first year of life

Journal

MOLECULAR AUTISM
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13229-022-00503-8

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Federal grants from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [R01HD055741, 5R01HD055741-14]
  2. National Institute of Mental Health [R01MH118362, MH118362-02S1]
  3. National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders [1R03DC017944]
  4. Autism Science Foundation [19-006]
  5. Allerton Foundation
  6. McMorris Family Foundation
  7. Simons Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Some studies have shown delayed or reduced canonical babbling in infants at high familial likelihood for ASD, but evidence is mixed. This study found that infants diagnosed with ASD at 12 months had significantly lower canonical babbling ratios compared to infants without ASD and low familial likelihood infants. Infants without ASD but with language delay also showed reduced canonical babbling ratios at 12 months.
Background Canonical babbling-producing syllables with a mature consonant, full vowel, and smooth transition-is an important developmental milestone that typically occurs in the first year of life. Some studies indicate delayed or reduced canonical babbling in infants at high familial likelihood for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) or who later receive an ASD diagnosis, but evidence is mixed. More refined characterization of babbling in the first year of life in infants with high likelihood for ASD is needed. Methods Vocalizations produced at 6 and 12 months by infants (n = 267) taking part in a longitudinal study were coded for canonical and non-canonical syllables. Infants were categorized as low familial likelihood (LL), high familial likelihood diagnosed with ASD at 24 months (HL-ASD) or not diagnosed (HL-Neg). Language delay was assessed based on 24-month expressive and receptive language scores. Canonical babble ratio (CBR) was calculated by dividing the number of canonical syllables by the number of total syllables. Generalized linear (mixed) models were used to assess the relationship between group membership and CBR, controlling for site, sex, and maternal education. Logistic regression was used to assess whether canonical babbling ratios at 6 and 12 months predict 24-month diagnostic outcome. Results No diagnostic group differences in CBR were detected at 6 months, but HL-ASD infants produced significantly lower CBR than both the HL-Neg and LL groups at 12 months. HL-Neg infants with language delay also showed reduced CBR at 12 months. Neither 6- nor 12-month CBR was significant predictors of 24-month diagnostic outcome (ASD versus no ASD) in logistic regression. Limitations Small numbers of vocalizations produced by infants at 6 months may limit the reliability of CBR estimates. It is not known if results generalize to infants who are not at high familial likelihood, or infants from more diverse racial and socioeconomic backgrounds. Conclusions Lower canonical babbling ratios are apparent by the end of the first year of life in ASD regardless of later language delay, but are also observed for infants with later language delay without ASD. Canonical babbling may lack specificity as an early marker when used on its own.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available