4.6 Article

Design, Characterization, and Liftoff of an Insect-Scale Soft Robotic Dragonfly Powered by Dielectric Elastomer Actuators

Journal

MICROMACHINES
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/mi13071136

Keywords

biologically inspired robot; soft robot; dielectric elastomer actuator; flapping-wing; micro-aerial-vehicle

Funding

  1. Research Laboratory of Electronics (RLE) at MIT, under the Research Support Committee Grant [2244181]
  2. MIT MISTI program [F2244201]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Researchers have developed the first robot that simulates dragonflies and discovered that the interaction between the forewings and hindwings significantly affects the lift force production and aerodynamic efficiency of the robot.
Dragonflies are agile and efficient flyers that use two pairs of wings for demonstrating exquisite aerial maneuvers. Compared to two-winged insects such as bees or flies, dragonflies leverage forewing and hindwing interactions for achieving higher efficiency and net lift. Here we develop the first at-scale dragonfly-like robot and investigate the influence of flapping-wing kinematics on net lift force production. Our 317 mg robot is driven by two independent dielectric elastomer actuators that flap four wings at 350 Hz. We extract the robot flapping-wing kinematics using a high-speed camera, and further measure the robot lift forces at different operating frequencies, voltage amplitudes, and phases between the forewings and hindwings. Our robot achieves a maximum lift-to-weight ratio of 1.49, and its net lift force increases by 19% when the forewings and hindwings flap in-phase compared to out-of-phase flapping. These at-scale experiments demonstrate that forewing-hindwing interaction can significantly influence lift force production and aerodynamic efficiency of flapping-wing robots with passive wing pitch designs. Our results could further enable future experiments to achieve feedback-controlled flights.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available