4.4 Article

Z′-mediated Majorana dark matter: suppressed direct-detection rate and complementarity of LHC searches

Journal

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
Volume -, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP08(2022)093

Keywords

Dark Matter at Colliders; Models for Dark Matter; New Gauge Interactions; SMEFT

Funding

  1. STFC [ST/T000988/1]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [EXC 2121, 390833306]
  3. National Science Foundation [PHY-1607611]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the direct-detection rate for axial-vectorial dark matter scattering off nuclei is investigated in an SU(2) x U(1) invariant effective theory and compared to the reach of the LHC. The study finds regions in the parameter space where the detection rates can be suppressed and constructs consistent UV models to generate the relevant effective theory. Constraints from both collider and direct-detection experiments on the same parameter space are discussed. A benchmark scenario is found where the LHC constraints have a greater sensitivity to the mediator mass, even for the future XENONnT experiment.
We study the direct-detection rate for axial-vectorial dark matter scattering off nuclei in an SU(2) x U(1) invariant effective theory and compare it against the LHC reach. Current constraints from direct detection experiments are already bounding the mediator mass to be well into the TeV range for WIMP-like scenarios. This motivates a consistent and systematic exploration of the parameter space to map out possible regions where the rates could be suppressed. We do indeed find such regions and proceed to construct consistent UV models that generate the relevant effective theory. We then discuss the corresponding constraints from both collider and direct-detection experiments on the same parameter space. We find a benchmark scenario, where even for future XENONnT experiment, LHC constraints will have a greater sensitivity to the mediator mass.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available