4.6 Article

Hybrid Event-Triggered and Impulsive Control Strategy for Multiagent Systems With Switching Topologies

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CYBERNETICS
Volume 52, Issue 7, Pages 6283-6294

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCYB.2020.3035713

Keywords

Topology; Network topology; Switches; Interference; Frequency control; Control systems; Communication networks; Consensus; event-triggered control; impulsive control; multiagent systems (MASs); switching topologies

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61771004]
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article investigates hybrid event-triggered and impulsive consensus problems for leaderless and leader-following multiagent systems with switching topologies. A hybrid control strategy is designed to reduce communication frequency and ensure consensus. The effectiveness is demonstrated through numerical examples and simulations, and a comparison with previous methods is provided.
This article investigates the hybrid event-triggered and impulsive consensus problems for leaderless and leader-following multiagent systems (MASs) with switching topologies. Based on the state information of neighboring agents at event-triggered moments and impulsive instants, a hybrid event-triggered and impulsive control strategy (HETICS) is designed to reduce the communication frequency between neighboring agents and to ensure consensus of leaderless and leader-following MASs. By utilizing the Lyapunov direct method, some consensus criteria are obtained for leaderless and leader-following MASs with switching topologies. It is shown that the HETICS excludes the Zeno behavior. Several numerical examples and simulations are given to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed consensus strategy and a comparison with previous consensus control methods is given.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available