4.7 Article

How Does the Environment Affect Wheat Yield and Protein Content Response to Drought? A Meta-Analysis

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE
Volume 13, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.896985

Keywords

drought stress; protein; wheat; yield; drought response

Categories

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2020YFD1000805]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31671631]
  3. Minor Grain Crops Research and Development System of Shaanxi Province (2016-2019)
  4. Focus on Research and Development of Science and Technology Plan Projects in Shaanxi Province [2018 TSCX L-NY-03-04]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study comprehensively explored how the environment affects wheat yield and protein content response to drought through meta-analysis. The results showed that drought significantly decreased wheat yield and protein yield, but increased protein content and nitrogen content. The responses of yield and nitrogen content to drought were mainly related to the drought type, while protein yield was mainly related to precipitation. Sandy soils and high nitrogen application level mitigated the negative effects of drought, and winter wheat showed better drought resistance than spring wheat.
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is one of the most significant cereal crops grown in the semi-arid and temperate regions of the world, but few studies comprehensively explore how the environment affects wheat yield and protein content response to drought by means of meta-analysis. Therefore, we collected data about grain yield (GY), grain protein yield (GPY), grain protein content (GPC), and grain nitrogen content (GNC), and conducted a meta-analysis on 48 previously published data sets that originate from 15 countries. Our results showed that drought significantly decreased GY and GPY by 57.32 and 46.04%, but significantly increased GPC and GNC by 9.38 and 9.27%, respectively. The responses of wheat GY and GNC to drought were mainly related to the drought type, while the GPY was mainly related to the precipitation. The yield reduction due to continuous drought stress (CD, 83.60%) was significantly greater than that of terminal drought stress (TD, 26.43%). The relationship between the precipitation and GPY increased in accordance with linear functions, and this negative drought effect was completely eliminated when the precipitation was more than 513 mm. Sandy soils and high nitrogen application level significantly mitigated the negative effects of drought, but was not the main factor affecting the drought response of wheat. Compared with spring wheat, the drought resistance effect of winter wheat was more obvious. Evaluation of these models can improve our quantitative understanding of drought on wheat yield and food security, minimizing the negative impact of drought on crop production.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available