4.7 Article

Vaginal Microbiota Changes Caused by HPV Infection in Chinese Women

Journal

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.814668

Keywords

HPV infection; cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; vaginal microbiota; age; L; gasseri-dominated; community state types (CST)

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2019YFC1200400]
  2. General Administration of Customs, P.R. China [2019HK125]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that HPV infection is related to vaginal microbiota in Chinese women, and specific bacteria are associated with HPV infection and cervical neoplasia. Age is also a factor influencing HPV infection.
Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is one of the most common sexually transmitted diseases. After studying 602 unvaccinated Chinese women using 16S rRNA to detect cervical-vaginal microecology, we analyzed the relationship between HPV infection and vaginal microecology including 20 HPV types. In Chinese women, L. gasseri-dominated and L. jensenii-dominated clusters were significantly absence. Microbial alpha diversity was significantly higher in HPV-infected and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)-diagnosed groups than in healthy control group. Certain bacteria were associated with HPV infection and CIN, including Streptococcus, Prevotella, Chlamydia, Bifidobacterium, Ralstonia, and Aerococcus. With the development of disease, the proportions of community state type III (CST-III) and CST-IV-B gradually increased, whereas the proportions of CST-I and CST-IV-A gradually decreased. In addition, age was an influential factor for HPV infection. With aging, the probability of HPV infection and the proportion of CST-IV-B increase. In conclusion, our study was a large cross-sectional study that evaluated the relationship between vaginal microbiota and HPV infection, and brought essential comparable data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available