4.8 Article

Perceptual restoration fails to recover unconscious processing for smooth eye movements after occipital stroke

Journal

ELIFE
Volume 11, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

eLIFE SCIENCES PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.67573

Keywords

pre-saccadic attention; occipital stroke; eye movements; vision restoration; hemianopia; motion processing; Human

Categories

Funding

  1. National Eye Institute [EY027314, EY021209, EY030998]
  2. Research to Prevent Blindness

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that damage to the primary visual cortex (V1) can result in loss of conscious perception but does not necessarily affect unconscious abilities. Patients with V1 damage were still able to perform accurate saccades and automatically track target motion in their intact fields, but not in their blind fields.
The visual pathways that guide actions do not necessarily mediate conscious perception. Patients with primary visual cortex (V1) damage lose conscious perception but often retain unconscious abilities (e.g. blindsight). Here, we asked if saccade accuracy and post-saccadic following responses (PFRs) that automatically track target motion upon saccade landing are retained when conscious perception is lost. We contrasted these behaviors in the blind and intact fields of 11 chronic V1-stroke patients, and in 8 visually intact controls. Saccade accuracy was relatively normal in all cases. Stroke patients also had normal PFR in their intact fields, but no PFR in their blind fields. Thus, V1 damage did not spare the unconscious visual processing necessary for automatic, post-saccadic smooth eye movements. Importantly, visual training that recovered motion perception in the blind field did not restore the PFR, suggesting a clear dissociation between pathways mediating perceptual restoration and automatic actions in the V1-damaged visual system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available