4.8 Article

Exogenous capture accounts for fundamental differences between pro- and antisaccade performance

Journal

ELIFE
Volume 11, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

eLIFE SCIENCES PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.76964

Keywords

visual attention; decision making; saccadic eye movements; salience; visuomotor control; Human

Categories

Funding

  1. National Eye Institute [R01EY025172]
  2. National Institute of Mental Health [R21MH120784]
  3. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [R01EY025172]
  4. [T32NS073553]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Oculomotor circuits take into consideration exogenous and endogenous influences to complete target selection. In high urgency conditions, the exogenous signal arrives approximately -80 ms after the cue onset, accelerating the incorrect plan towards the cue, while the informed endogenous signal arrives slightly later, favoring the correct plan away from the cue. The exogenous response is largely unaffected by task instructions.
To generate the next eye movement, oculomotor circuits take into consideration the physical salience of objects in view and current behavioral goals, exogenous and endogenous influences, respectively. However, the interactions between exogenous and endogenous mechanisms and their dynamic contributions to target selection have been difficult to resolve because they evolve extremely rapidly. In a recent study (Salinas et al., 2019), we achieved the necessary temporal precision using an urgent variant of the antisaccade task wherein motor plans are initiated early and choice accuracy depends sharply on when exactly the visual cue information becomes available. Empirical and modeling results indicated that the exogenous signal arrives -80 ms after cue onset and rapidly accelerates the (incorrect) plan toward the cue, whereas the informed endogenous signal arrives similar to 25 ms later to favor the (correct) plan away from the cue. Here, we scrutinize a key mechanistic hypothesis about this dynamic, that the exogenous and endogenous signals act at different times and independently of each other. We test quantitative model predictions by comparing the performance of human participants instructed to look toward a visual cue or away from it under high urgency. We find that, indeed, the exogenous response is largely impervious to task instructions; it simply flips its sign relative to the correct choice, and this largely explains the drastic differences in psychometric performance between the two tasks. Thus, saccadic choices are strongly dictated by the alignment between salience and behavioral goals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available