4.7 Article

Predictors of retirement satisfaction in the older adults of Urmia: a cross-sectional study

Journal

BMC GERIATRICS
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12877-022-03259-1

Keywords

Retirement satisfaction; Quality of life; Life satisfaction

Funding

  1. Urmia University of Medical Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that life satisfaction and quality of life are important factors influencing retirement satisfaction. To improve retirement satisfaction in all aspects and subcomponents, it is recommended to enhance these two factors.
Background Retirement is a challenge that, as a process, influences the individual's role, status, life patterns, expectations, and available resources. Therefore, the present study aims at determining the predictors of retirement satisfaction among men in the city of Urmia. Methods In this descriptive-analytical study, 140 retired men living in Urmia were selected by multi-stage sampling method. The instruments used are the Retirement Satisfaction Scale, life satisfaction, and quality of life questionnaires. Data were analyzed in SPSS v.21 using descriptive statistics, one-way ANOVA, and regression at a significance level of p <= 0.05. Results Based on the results of this study, the mean score of retirement satisfaction was 115.37 + 10.13 and there was no significant difference (p = .068) in retirement satisfaction of the retired men based on level of education. Also, the retrospective multiple linear regression model indicated that 44.4% of the variance of retirement satisfaction score is predicted by two subscales of life satisfaction and quality of life. Conclusion According to the results, it seems that life satisfaction and quality of life are inseparable, effective factors in retirement satisfaction, so, to promote retirement satisfaction in all of its scales and subscales, it is recommended to improve these two factors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available