4.5 Article

Source Identification of PM2.5 during a Smoke Haze Period in Chiang Mai, Thailand, Using Stable Carbon and Nitrogen Isotopes

Journal

ATMOSPHERE
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/atmos13071149

Keywords

biomass burning; PM2.5; stable isotope; C-3 plants

Funding

  1. Thailand Science Research and Innovation (TSRI) [RDG6030019]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [41761144056]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the sources of PM2.5 in Chiang Mai city using stable carbon and nitrogen isotopes, and confirms that biomass burning is the main contributor, with C-3 and C-4 plants contributing 74% and 26% respectively.
Open biomass burning (BB) has contributed severely to the ambient levels of particulate matter of less than 2.5 mu m diameter (PM2.5) in upper northern Thailand over the last decade. Some methods have been reported to identify the sources of burning using chemical compositions, i.e., ions, metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, etc. However, recent advances in nuclear techniques have been limited in use due to their specific instrumentation. The aims of this study were to investigate the sources of ambient PM2.5 in Chiang Mai city using stable carbon (delta C-13) and nitrogen isotopes (delta N-15). The mean concentrations of total carbon (TC) and total nitrogen (TN) in PM2.5 were 12.2 +/- 5.42 and 1.91 +/- 1.07 mu g/m(3), respectively, whereas delta C-13 and delta N-15 PM2.5 were -26.1 +/- 0.77 parts per thousand and 10.3 +/- 2.86 parts per thousand, respectively. This isotopic analysis confirmed that biomass burning was the source of PM2.5 and that C-3 and C-4 plants contributed about 74% and 26%, respectively. These study results confirm that the stable isotope is an important tool in identifying the sources of aerosols.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available