4.6 Article

3D Printing Technique for Experimental Modeling of Hydraulic Structures: Exemplary Scaled Weir Models

Journal

WATER
Volume 14, Issue 14, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w14142153

Keywords

piano key weir; discharge coefficient; 3D printing; hydraulic model fabrication; hydraulic experiments

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluates the feasibility of applying 3D printing to fabricate scaled hydraulic experimental models for laboratory use. The results show that properly 3D printed models are more cost- and time-effective during the fabrication process and can deliver accurate results. The layer height of 3D printed models is found to be a critical parameter influencing model quality, and surface irregularities may affect experimental results.
3D printing is a fast growing industry and is affecting many areas of our daily lives, e.g., in medical fields, mechanics, as well as engineering. For hydraulic experimental modeling, this technique offers a new alternative that could enable a more sufficient and rapid model fabrication, especially for models that feature complex geometries. The present study thus evaluates the feasibility of applying 3D printing to fabricate scaled hydraulic experimental models for laboratory use. Various weir models were printed and compared to conventionally produced reference models in terms of the fabrication process, resulting discharge coefficients, and hydraulic performance. Results show that while being more cost- and time-effective during the fabrication process, properly 3D printed models were able to fulfill experimental requirements and deliver accurate results with a relative deviation less than 5% compared to conventionally fabricated models. The printing layer height was found to be the most critical parameter influencing the model's final quality. Associated with the additive building approach, surface irregularities of 3D printed models were noted to be able to cause undesired nappe behavior, which might affect experimental results under certain conditions. To avoid such issues, a reduction of plotted layer heights or additional surface improvements could be helpful. Based on experimental results and visual assessments, 0.4 mm layer height can be recommended as a good compromise for model configurations tested herein.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available