Pollutant Removal and Energy Recovery from Swine Wastewater Using Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactor: A Comparative Study with Up-Flow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket

Due to its high content of organics and nutrients, swine wastewater has become one of the main environment pollution sources. Exploring high-efficient technologies for swine wastewater treatment is urgent and becoming a hot topic in the recent years. The present study introduces anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) for efficient treatment of swine wastewater, compared with up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) as a traditional system. Pollutant removal performance, methanogenic properties, and microbial community structures were investigated in both reactors. Results showed that by intercepting particulate organics, AnMBR achieved stable and much higher chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal rate (approximately 90%) than UASB (around 60%). Due to higher methanogenic activity of anaerobic sludge, methane yield of AnMBR (0.23 L/g-COD) was higher than that of UASB. Microbial community structure analysis showed enrichment of functional bacteria that can remove refractory organic matter in the AnMBR, which promoted the organics conversion processes. In addition, obvious accumulation of acetotrophic and hydrotrophic methanogens in AnMBR system was recorded, which could broaden the organic matter degradation pathways and the methanogenesis processes, ensuring a higher methane yield. Through energy balance analysis, results concluded that the net energy recovery efficiency of AnMBR was higher than that of UASB system, indicating that applying AnMBR for livestock wastewater treatment could not only efficiently remove pollutants, but also significantly enhance the energy recovery.

Automated summary

This study introduces an efficient technology, anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR), for treating swine wastewater. Compared to the traditional up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) system, AnMBR achieved higher chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal rate and methane yield, and promoted the organic matter conversion processes. In addition, the net energy recovery efficiency of AnMBR was also higher than that of UASB system.