4.6 Review

A Review and Analysis of Water Research, Development, and Management in Bangladesh

Journal

WATER
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w14121834

Keywords

Bangladesh; hydrology; floods; groundwater; arsenic; rainwater harvesting; water sharing; climate change; Bangladesh Delta Plan; BDP 2100

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper provides an overview of water research, development, and management in Bangladesh, with a focus on water quality-related research. A bibliometric analysis is used to analyze water-related publications in Bangladesh, revealing a dominance of water quality research compared to water quantity research. Arsenic contamination and climate change have received significant attention in recent years. The Bangladesh Delta Plan 2100, a visionary master plan, is expected to shape water management in response to climate change. The paper concludes with recommendations for sustainable water management in Bangladesh.
This paper presents a review of water research, development, and management in Bangladesh, with examples drawn from the past and present. A bibliometric analysis is adopted here to analyze the water-related publication data of Bangladesh. Water-quality-related research is the dominating research field in Bangladesh as compared to water-quantity (floods and droughts)-related ones. The most productive author was found to be Ahmed KM for water-related publication in Bangladesh. The arsenic contamination in Bangladesh has received the highest attention (13 out of the top 15 highly cited papers are related to arsenic contamination). Climate-change-related topics have been showing an increasing trend in research publications over the last 5 years. Bangladesh Delta Plan 2100, prepared recently, is a visionary master plan that is expected to shape water management in Bangladesh in the coming decades to adapt to climate change. A set of recommendations is made here to achieve sustainable water management in Bangladesh.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available