4.6 Review

Collateral Blood Flow and Ischemic Core Growth

Journal

TRANSLATIONAL STROKE RESEARCH
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages 13-21

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12975-022-01051-2

Keywords

Stroke; Collaterals; Ischemic core; Growth; Perfusion

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Treatment of large vessel occlusion in acute ischemic stroke focuses on restoring blood flow and endovascular thrombectomy has shown favorable outcomes. However, treatment delays occur when patients need to be transferred to comprehensive stroke centers. Collateral blood flow is crucial in mitigating ischemic core growth, and imaging techniques can help predict this growth during delays and inform decisions on transfer and endovascular therapy.
Treatment of a large vessel occlusion in the acute ischemic stroke setting focuses on vessel recanalization, and endovascular thrombectomy results in favorable outcomes in appropriate candidates. Expeditious treatment is imperative, but patients often present to institutions that do not have neurointerventional surgeons and need to be transferred to a comprehensive stroke center. These treatment delays are common, and it is important to identify factors that mitigate the progression of the ischemic core in order to maximize the preservation of salvageable brain tissue. Collateral blood flow is the strongest factor known to influence ischemic core growth, which includes the input arterial vessels, tissue-level vessels, and venous outflow. Collateral blood flow at these different levels may be imaged by specific imaging techniques that may also predict ischemic core growth during treatment delays and help identify patients who would benefit from transfer and endovascular therapy, as well as identify those patients in whom transfer may be futile. Here we review collateral blood flow and its relationship to ischemic core growth in stroke patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available