4.7 Article

Could the Presence of Thrips AFFECT the Yield Potential of Genetically Modified and Conventional Maize?

Journal

TOXINS
Volume 14, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/toxins14070502

Keywords

Bt maize; non-target arthropods; abundance; Thripidae; pest control

Funding

  1. European Regional Development Fund [ITMS 313011W112]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to investigate the impact of genetically modified maize MON810 on thrips communities on maize plants. The results showed that MON810 maize had no effect on the occurrence or composition of thrips, and their presence was influenced by other factors.
Maize pests like Ostrinia nubilalis and Diabrotica virgifera virgifera are eradicated using genetically modified maize. This study's goal was to see if the genetically modified maize MON810 is also toxic to thrips communities on maize. The impact of Bt maize on thrips diversity and abundance, as well as yield losses, was studied in the field in Borovce for three years (Slovakia). The study used 10 Bt and 10 non-Bt maize cultivars. Thrips were monitored every two weeks during the season using transparent sticky traps installed on the experimental plots (one per plot, 20 per year). In total, 3426 thrips were caught. Thrips populations usually peak around the end of July at BBCH55. Among the species identified were Limothrips denticornis, Limothrips cerealium, Haplothrips aculeatus, Frankliniella schultzei, Frankliniella occidentalis, Thrips tabaci, Aeolothrips fasciatus, Frankliniella tenuicornis, and Chirothrips spp. We found that MON810 maize had no effect on the occurrence or composition of thrips. Their presence was affected by the maize growth phase and growing seasons and partially by the weather. The direct effect on the grain yield was not confirmed. Our research contributed to scientific knowledge of thrips communities found on maize plants in Central Europe, including Bt maize.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available