4.7 Article

Machine-Learning-Based Change Detection of Newly Constructed Areas from GF-2 Imagery in Nanjing, China

Journal

REMOTE SENSING
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs14122874

Keywords

deep learning algorithms; remote sensing; GF-2 high-resolution images; change detection; newly constructed areas (NCAs); convolutional neural network (CNN)

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [GZ1447]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study applies deep learning models to detect changes in newly constructed areas. The results show that the STANet-PAM model performs the best in terms of detection accuracy and provides more detailed information on land changes. The findings of this study are of significant reference value for urban development planning.
Change detection of the newly constructed areas (NCAs) is important for urban development. The advances of remote sensing and deep learning algorithms promotes the high precision of the research work. In this study, we firstly constructed a high-resolution labels for change detection based on the GF-2 satellite images, and then applied five deep learning models of change detection, including STANets (BASE, BAM, and PAM), SNUNet (Siam-NestedUNet), and BiT (Bitemporal image Transformer) in the Core Region of Jiangbei New Area of Nanjing, China. The BiT model is based on transformer, and the others are based on CNN (Conventional Neural Network). Experiments have revealed that the STANet-PAM model generally performs the best in detecting the NCAs, and the STANet-PAM model can obtain more detailed information of land changes owing to its pyramid spatial-temporal attention module of multiple scales. At last, we have used the five models to analyze urbanization processes from 2015 to 2021 in the study area. Hopefully, the results of this study could be a momentous reference for urban development planning.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available