4.7 Article

Segmentation of PMSE Data Using Random Forests

Journal

REMOTE SENSING
Volume 14, Issue 13, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs14132976

Keywords

space physics; upper atmosphere; random forests; segmentation

Funding

  1. Research Council of Norway [NFR 245683, 245683]
  2. Norway (NFR)
  3. Sweden (VR)
  4. Finland (SA)
  5. Japan (NIPR)
  6. Japan (STEL)
  7. China (CRIPR)
  8. United Kingdom (NERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents an approach to segment Polar Mesospheric Summer Echoes (PMSE) from datasets obtained from EISCAT VHF radar data. The method involves manual labeling of data into different categories and using random forests algorithm to segment the PMSE. The results show that random forests can effectively segment the PMSE and the weighted-down labels technique improves the performance.
EISCAT VHF radar data are used for observing, monitoring, and understanding Earth's upper atmosphere. This paper presents an approach to segment Polar Mesospheric Summer Echoes (PMSE) from datasets obtained from EISCAT VHF radar data. The data consist of 30 observations days, corresponding to 56,250 data samples. We manually labeled the data into three different categories: PMSE, Ionospheric background, and Background noise. For segmentation, we employed random forests on a set of simple features. These features include: altitude derivative, time derivative, mean, median, standard deviation, minimum, and maximum values corresponding to neighborhood sizes ranging from 3 by 3 to 11 by 11 pixels. Next, in order to reduce the model bias and variance, we employed a method that decreases the weight applied to pixel labels with large uncertainty. Our results indicate that, first, it is possible to segment PMSE from the data using random forests. Second, the weighted-down labels technique improves the performance of the random forests method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available