4.7 Article

Terrestrial and Airborne Structure from Motion Photogrammetry Applied for Change Detection within a Sinkhole in Thuringia, Germany

Journal

REMOTE SENSING
Volume 14, Issue 13, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs14133058

Keywords

3D reconstruction; point clouds; precision maps; multiscale normals

Funding

  1. Hanna Bremer Award for young female physical geographers of the Hanna Bremer Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Detection of geomorphological changes using SfM photogrammetry requires high-quality 3D reconstruction and precise point estimates. This study compared the 3D point clouds and detectable change patterns obtained from different sensors and data collection methods over multiple years. The results showed that the detectable changes of the sinkhole walls were generally similar between aerial and terrestrial surveys.
Detection of geomorphological changes based on structure from motion (SfM) photogrammetry is highly dependent on the quality of the 3D reconstruction from high-quality images and the correspondingly derived point precision estimates. For long-term monitoring, it is interesting to know if the resulting 3D point clouds and derived detectable changes over the years are comparable, even though different sensors and data collection methods were applied. Analyzing this, we took images of a sinkhole terrestrially with a Nikon D3000 and aerially with a DJI drone camera in 2017, 2018, and 2019 and computed 3D point clouds and precision maps using Agisoft PhotoScan and the SfM_Georef software. Applying the multiscale model to model cloud comparison using precision maps plugin (M3C2-PM) in CloudCompare, we analyzed the differences between the point clouds arising from the different sensors and data collection methods per year. Additionally, we were interested if the patterns of detectable change over the years were comparable between the data collection methods. Overall, we found that the spatial pattern of detectable changes of the sinkhole walls were generally similar between the aerial and terrestrial surveys, which were performed using different sensors and camera locations. Although the terrestrial data collection was easier to perform, there were often challenges due to terrain and vegetation around the sinkhole to safely acquire adequate viewing angles to cover the entire sinkhole, which the aerial survey was able to overcome. The local levels of detection were also considerably lower for point clouds resulting from aerial surveys, likely due to the ability to obtain closer-range imagery within the sinkhole.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available