4.7 Review

Functionalization of Electrospun Nanofiber for Bone Tissue Engineering

Journal

POLYMERS
Volume 14, Issue 14, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym14142940

Keywords

electrospun nanofiber; bone-tissue engineering; functionalization; scaffold; bone regeneration

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52163016]
  2. Jiangxi Provincial program for the academic and technological leaders of main subjects [20213BCJL22051]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review introduces bone-tissue engineering and the use of electrospun nanofibers as scaffolds. The unique characteristics of electrospun nanofibers, such as their similarity with the extracellular matrix, larger surface areas, porosity, and processability, make them ideal candidates for bone-tissue engineering. The review highlights the functionalization of electrospun nanofibers to enhance bone regeneration and addresses the existing deficiencies in promoting osteogenesis.
Bone-tissue engineering is an alternative treatment for bone defects with great potential in which scaffold is a critical factor to determine the effect of bone regeneration. Electrospun nanofibers are widely used as scaffolds in the biomedical field for their similarity with the structure of the extracellular matrix (ECM). Their unique characteristics are: larger surface areas, porosity and processability; these make them ideal candidates for bone-tissue engineering. This review briefly introduces bone-tissue engineering and summarizes the materials and methods for electrospining. More importantly, how to functionalize electrospun nanofibers to make them more conducive for bone regeneration is highlighted. Finally, the existing deficiencies of functionalized electrospun nanofibers for promoting osteogenesis are proposed. Such a summary can lay the foundation for the clinical practice of functionalized electrospun nanofibers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available