4.7 Article

The Impact of Reprocessing with a Quad Screw Extruder on the Degradation of Polypropylene

Journal

POLYMERS
Volume 14, Issue 13, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym14132661

Keywords

polymer degradation; twin-screw extruder; quad-screw extruder

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the impact of a quad screw extruder on the reprocessing of an impact copolymer polypropylene. The quad screw extruder showed greater reductions in molecular weight compared to a twin-screw extruder.
During mechanical recycling, polypropylene typically is reprocessed using a single- or twin-screw extruder. The degradation of polypropylene during this reprocessing reduces the polymer's molecular weight and, consequently, limits the performance of the recycled resin. This work investigated the impact of a quad screw extruder (QSE), which has greater free volume, on the reprocessing of an impact copolymer polypropylene. To mimic the recycling process, the polypropylene was subjected to three processing cycles using a QSE and a comparable twin-screw extruder (TSE) operated at three screw speeds. The reprocessed materials were characterized for their rheological, morphological, and mechanical properties. For both extruders, increasing the number of reprocessing cycles and the screw speed resulted in higher melt flow indices, decreases in zero-shear viscosity, and shifting of the crossover points for the storage and loss moduli, which indicate reductions in the molecular weight and narrowing of the molecular weight distribution of the polypropylene. The QSE exhibited greater reductions in molecular weight compared to the TSE, probably due to the higher stresses associated with the three intermeshing points along its screws. Reprocessing caused a significant reductions in the Izod impact strength of the reprocessed polypropylene, which correlated with reductions in the particle size and particle size distribution of the dispersed rubbery phase in the polypropylene during reprocessing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available