4.7 Article

Lyophilic and Sorption Properties of Chitosan Aerogels Modified with Copolymers Based on Glycidyl Methacrylate and Alkyl Methacrylates

Journal

POLYMERS
Volume 14, Issue 13, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym14132711

Keywords

chitosan; aerogel; grafted copolymers; hydrophobicity; oleophilicity; sorption properties

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation [075-15-2020-794]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper discusses the influence of copolymer structure on the wettability and sorption properties of surface-modified chitosan aerogels. The results show that increasing the amount of alkyl methacrylates leads to enhanced hydrophobicity and decreased water absorption, while maintaining high sorption capacity for light oil and synthetic motor oil.
This paper discusses the influence of the structure of copolymers based on glycidyl methacrylate and alkyl methacrylates with C-6-C-18 hydrocarbon side groups on the wettability and sorption properties of surface-modified chitosan aerogels. The grafting of copolymers onto the surface of aerogels was confirmed by elemental analysis, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy. As a result of the modification, with an increase in the amount of the hydrocarbon substituent alkyl methacrylate, the surface of the resulting materials became hydrophobic with contact angles in the range of 146-157 degrees. At the same time, the water absorption of the aerogels decreased by a factor of 30 compared to that for unmodified aerogels, while the sorption capacity for light oil, diesel fuel, and synthetic motor oil remained at the level of more than 30 g/g. Chitosan aerogels with grafted copolymers based on glycidyl methacrylate and alkyl methacrylates retain biodegradation capacity; however, compared to unmodified chitosan, this process has an induction period.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available