4.3 Article

Comparison of in-person and synchronous remote musculoskeletal exam using augmented reality and haptics: A pilot study

Journal

PM&R
Volume 15, Issue 7, Pages 891-898

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pmrj.12883

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This pilot study evaluated the potential of ARTESH in remotely examining upper extremity passive range of motion (PROM) and maximum isometric strength (MIS). The results showed high inter-rater agreements between remote and in-person evaluations for certain shoulder and arm movements. The study suggests that ARTESH has the potential to enhance the value of telemedicine platforms, but further improvements and studies are needed for better evaluation.
Introduction Utilization of telemedicine for health care delivery increased rapidly during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. However, physical examination during telehealth visits remains limited. A novel telerehabilitation system-The Augmented Reality-based Telerehabilitation System with Haptics (ARTESH)-shows promise for performing synchronous, remote musculoskeletal examination. Objective Tssess the potential of ARTESH in remotely examining upper extremity passive range of motion (PROM) and maximum isometric strength (MIS). Design In this cross-sectional pilot study, we compared the in-person (reference standard) and remote evaluations (ARTESH) of participants' upper extremity PROM and MIS in 10 shoulder and arm movements. The evaluators were blinded to each other's results. Setting Participants underwent in-person evaluations at a Veterans Affairs hospital's outpatient Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PM&R) clinic, and underwent remote examination using ARTESH with the evaluator located at a research lab 30 miles away, connected via a high-speed network. Patients Fifteen participants with upper extremity pain and/or weakness. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures Inter-rater agreement between in-person and remote evaluations on 10 PROM and MIS movements and presence/absence of pain with movement was calculated. Results The highest inter-rater agreements were noted in shoulder abduction and protraction PROM (kappa (kappa) = 0.44, confidence interval (CI): -0.1 to 1.0), and in elbow flexion, shoulder abduction, and shoulder protraction MIS (kappa = 0.63, CI: 0 to 1.0). Conclusions This pilot study suggests that synchronous tele-physical examination using the ARTESH system with augmented reality and haptics has the potential to provide enhanced value to existing telemedicine platforms. With the additional technological and procedural improvements and with an adequately powered study, the accuracy of ARTESH-enabled remote tele-physical examinations can be better evaluated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available