4.3 Article

Ultra-Orthodox Women in the Job Market: What Helps Them to Become Healthy and Satisfied?

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19138092

Keywords

family quality of life; community sense of coherence; diversity climate; inclusive leadership; job satisfaction; mental health

Funding

  1. Israel Ministry of Science and Technology [3-15598]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the mental health and job satisfaction of Ultra-Orthodox women working in different cultural environments, and found differences and similarities among different groups. Family and community were identified as important resources for mental health, while both traditional and other resources were important for job satisfaction.
This study explored the mental health and job satisfaction of Ultra-Orthodox women who work in different cultural environments. Data were gathered from 304 Ultra-Orthodox women who belong to various streams in this society and who were recruited by the Midgam research panel. The participants filled out self-reported questionnaires that assessed their family quality of life, community sense of coherence, diversity climate, inclusive leadership, job satisfaction, and mental health. The participants ranged in age between 19 and 64 years (M = 30.86, SD = 8.71); 43.1% worked within the Ultra-Orthodox enclave, while 22.4% worked with both Ultra-Orthodox and secular individuals and 34.5% worked in mainly secular environments. We observed differences and similarities among the three groups of women. Community sense of coherence was weakest among those who worked outside the enclave, while diversity perception and inclusive leadership were highest among that group. In all three groups, family and community were the most important resources for mental health. Both traditional resources (i.e., family and community) and other resources (i.e., perception of diversity climate and inclusive leadership) were important for job satisfaction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available