4.7 Article

Composition and Conservation Value of Epiphytic Lichen Communities on Common Ash in North-Western Alps: A First Assessment

Journal

FORESTS
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/f13081288

Keywords

lichens; Fraxinus; conservation; biodiversity; red-listed species

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analyzed the epiphytic lichen communities on ash trees in the Aosta Valley and found variations in their occurrence and frequencies at different sampling sites. Environmental variables such as elevation, solar radiation, and source vicinity significantly influenced the composition of lichen communities. The presence of ash trees is important for the conservation of rare lichen species in the Italian Alps.
In the western sector of the Alps, and particularly in the Aosta Valley, lichenological communities on broad-leaved trees have received very little attention, and information about lichen species associated with common ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) are still scanty. Therefore, in this study, we analyzed epiphytic lichen communities of ash trees to estimate their composition, their conservation value, and their association with some key environmental variables. Our results show that lichen communities appear to be different in terms of occurrence and frequencies in different sampling sites. The tested environmental variables contribute to shape the lichen communities, which are significantly different (p < 0.05) in sites characterized by different elevation, solar radiation, and source vicinity. The conservation value of lichen species was assessed by comparing distributional data at the national and local level. Our findings show that, in the Italian Alps, ash trees represent an important substrate for locally, or even nationally, rare lichens: 14 recorded species were not previously known in the study area, and some (Lecanora impudens and Rinodina polyspora) were included in the red list of Italian epiphytic lichens.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available