4.7 Article

Nomenclature Notes and Typification of Names in Dracaena (Asparagaceae, Nolinoideae)

Journal

FORESTS
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/f13081237

Keywords

Asparaceae; lecotype; nomenclature; original material; taxonomy

Categories

Funding

  1. Key Research and Development Project of Sichuan Provincial Department of Science and Technology [2022YFN0032]
  2. High-level Talent Introduction Project of Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province of China [2021JDGD0019]
  3. High-level Talent Teams of Neijiang Normal University [RSC202102]
  4. Scientific Research Project of Neijiang Normal University [2020WJ02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two new names, Dracaena neoparviflora and Dracaena ridleyii, are proposed as replacement names for D. parviflora Baker and D. nutans Ridl. respectively. Lectotypes and neotype are designated for multiple species.
Two new names, Dracaena neoparviflora and Dracaena ridleyii are proposed as replacement names for the illegitimate names D. parviflora Baker, and D. nutans Ridl., respectively, the latter being a later homonym of D. parviflora Willd. ex Schult.f., and D. nutans H.Jaeger. Lectotypes are designated for D.cambodiana, D. interrupta (synonym of D. camerooniana), D. oddonii (synonym of D. camerooniana), D. cantleyi, D. cinnabari, D. cuspidibracteata (synonym of D. congoensis), D. haemanthoides, D. litoralis (synonym of D. braunii), D. parviflora, D. novoguineensis, D. nutans, D. petiolata, D. reflexa var. linearifolia, D. reflexa var. angustifolia, D. steudneri, D. tessmannii (synonym of D. mannii), and D. viridiflora. The second-step lectotypications are made for D. camerooniana, D. bushii, D. glomerata, D. papahu (synonym of D. steudneri), D. talbotii (synonym of D. bicolor), D. vaginata (synonym of D. viridiflora), and D. xiphophylla. A neotype is designated for the name Aletris arborea (basionym of D. arborea).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available