4.7 Article

Nondormant Acorns Show Higher Seed Dispersal Effectiveness Than Dormant Ones

Journal

FORESTS
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/f13060881

Keywords

seed germination; dormancy; trade-off; seed dispersal; seedling establishment

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [32070447, U2004150]
  2. Youth Talent Introduction and Education Program of Shandong Province [20190601]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study provides empirical evidence for the trade-off between seed dormancy and dispersal effectiveness, showing a negative correlation between seed dormancy and dispersal fitness. The results highlight the ecological role of seed germination schedule in seed dispersal and life history evolution.
Seed dormancy has been thought to be an important survival strategy to tune the seed dispersal timing. Although a theoretical trade-off between seed dormancy and dispersal is often proposed, empirical field evidence of the trade-off between seed dormancy, spatial dispersal, and seedling recruitment is still lacking. Here, we tracked seed dispersal of several Fagaceae species exhibiting different levels of dormancy both in artificial enclosures and in the field. We presented evidence that oak species with nondormant acorns rather than those bearing dormant species exhibit reduced spatial dispersal. Despite the empirical evidence that seed germination is negatively correlated with spatial dispersal, nondormancy rather than dormancy showed higher seed dispersal effectiveness, demonstrating a negative correlation between seed dormancy and dispersal fitness. Our study, using the oak-rodent system, may provide solid evidence of a dispersal-germination trade-off between spatial and temporal correlation, highlighting the ecological role of seed germination schedule in seed dispersal and life-history evolution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available