4.5 Article

Inter- and intraspecific variation in mycotoxin tolerance: A study of four Drosophila species

Journal

ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.9126

Keywords

geographical variation; interspecific genetic variation; intraspecific genetic variation; mycotoxin tolerance

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DOB/DEB--1737877]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the mycotoxin tolerance in various Drosophila species and reveals interspecific and intraspecific variations, as well as geographical and genetic variations. The findings lay the groundwork for further research on the genetic mechanisms of mycotoxin tolerance.
Many mycophagous Drosophila species have adapted to tolerate high concentrations of mycotoxins, an ability not reported in any other eukaryotes. Although an association between mycophagy and mycotoxin tolerance has been established in many Drosophila species, the genetic mechanisms of the tolerance are unknown. This study presents the inter- and intraspecific variation in the mycotoxin tolerance trait. We studied the mycotoxin tolerance in four Drosophila species from four separate clades within the immigrans-tripunctata radiation from two distinct locations. The effect of mycotoxin treatment on 20 isofemale lines per species was studied using seven gross phenotypes: survival to pupation, survival to eclosion, development time to pupation and eclosion, thorax length, fecundity, and longevity. We observed interspecific variation among four species, with D. falleni being the most tolerant, followed by D. recens, D. neotestacea, and D. tripunctata, in that order. The results also revealed geographical variation and intraspecific genetic variation in mycotoxin tolerance. This report provides the foundation for further delineating the genetic mechanisms of the mycotoxin tolerance trait.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available