4.8 Article

NF-KB memory coordinates transcriptional responses to dynamic inflammatory stimuli

Journal

CELL REPORTS
Volume 40, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111159

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH MSTP training grant [T32GM07281]
  2. NIH [R01GM128042, 75N93019C00041]
  3. Army Research Office [73231, SCR_019196]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study systematically profiles the NF-KB response to different signal sequences using high-throughput microfluidic live-cell analysis. The results show that the NF-KB dynamics store the short-term history of received signals and encode information about the identity and dose of the prior stimulus. This research provides insights into how signal transduction networks process inflammatory stimuli to coordinate cellular responses.
Many scenarios in cellular communication require cells to interpret multiple dynamic signals. It is unclear how exposure to inflammatory stimuli alters transcriptional responses to subsequent stimulus. Using high -throughput microfluidic live-cell analysis, we systematically profile the NF-KB response to different signal se-quences in single cells. We find that NF-KB dynamics store the short-term history of received signals: de-pending on the prior pathogenic or cytokine signal, the NF-KB response to subsequent stimuli varies from no response to full activation. Using information theory, we reveal that these stimulus-dependent changes in the NF-KB response encode and reflect information about the identity and dose of the prior stimulus. Small-molecule inhibition, computational modeling, and gene expression profiling show that this encoding is driven by stimulus-dependent engagement of negative feedback modules. These results provide a model for how signal transduction networks process sequences of inflammatory stimuli to coordinate cellular re-sponses in complex dynamic environments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available