4.6 Review

Using nasal sprays to prevent respiratory tract infections: a qualitative study of online consumer reviews and primary care patient interviews

Journal

BMJ OPEN
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059661

Keywords

qualitative research; respiratory infections; preventive medicine

Funding

  1. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Programme Grants for Applied Research (PGfAR) programme
  2. NIHR Programme Grant for Applied Research: REducing Common infections in Usual practice for Recurrent Respiratory tract Infections (RECUR) [PG-0218-20005]
  3. NIHR Applied Research Collaboration (ARC)-West
  4. NIHR Health Protection Research Unit (HPRU) for Behavioural Science and Evaluation
  5. NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre (BRC)
  6. NIHR BRC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explored the perceptions and experiences of lay people regarding the use of nasal sprays to prevent respiratory tract infections. The findings identified various factors that influence nasal spray use, including motivation to avoid infections, beliefs about alternative prevention methods, and personal experiences of spray success or failure. Providing information and advice could address concerns and help overcome difficulties.
Objectives Nasal sprays could be a promising approach to preventing respiratory tract infections (RTIs). This study explored lay people's perceptions and experiences of using nasal sprays to prevent RTIs to identify barriers and facilitators to their adoption and continued use. Design Qualitative research. Study 1 thematically analysed online consumer reviews of an RTI prevention nasal spray. Study 2 interviewed patients about their reactions to and experiences of a digital intervention that promotes and supports nasal spray use for RTI prevention (reactively: at 'first signs' of infection and preventatively: following possible/probable exposure to infection). Interview transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis. Setting Primary care, UK. Participants 407 online customer reviews. 13 purposively recruited primary care patients who had experienced recurrent infections and/or had risk factors for severe infections. Results Both studies identified various factors that might influence nasal spray use including: high motivation to avoid RTIs, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic; fatalistic views about RTIs; beliefs about alternative prevention methods; the importance of personal recommendation; perceived complexity and familiarity of nasal sprays; personal experiences of spray success or failure; tolerable and off-putting side effects; concerns about medicines; and the nose as unpleasant and unhygienic. Conclusions People who suffer disruptive, frequent or severe RTIs or who are vulnerable to RTIs are interested in using a nasal spray for prevention. They also have doubts and concerns and may encounter problems. Some of these may be reduced or eliminated by providing nasal spray users with information and advice that addresses these concerns or helps people overcome difficulties.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available