4.4 Article

Women's attitude towards intimate partner violence and utilization of contraceptive methods and maternal health care services: an analysis of nationally representative cross-sectional surveys from four South Asian countries

Journal

BMC WOMENS HEALTH
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12905-022-01780-4

Keywords

Intimate partner violence; Contraceptive methods; Antenatal care; Institutional delivery and post-natal care

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Women's justification of IPV is associated with decreased utilization of a wide range of maternal health care services, particularly in contraceptive methods, antenatal care visits, number of antenatal care services, institutional delivery, and postnatal care. Increasing levels of IPV justification are associated with a decreasing trend in antenatal care visits and institutional delivery. Women justifying IPV are less likely to have at least one antenatal care visit in urban areas compared to rural areas.
Background Intimate partner violence (IPV) adversely affects women's reproductive health outcomes but to what extent women's justification of IPV affects maternal health care service utilization is unexplored. Methods The secondary cross-sectional datasets from multiple indicator cluster surveys of Afghanistan, Bhutan, Nepal and Pakistan conducted between 2010 and 2015 were used. We used a generalized linear mixed model with random effects, at both cluster- and country-level, to determine the odds ratio of maternal health service utilization at the regional level and a multivariable logistic regression model adjusting for complex survey design at the country level. Interaction between women's justification of IPV and residential location, and linear trend in the utilization of maternal health care services associated with increasing levels of women's justification of IPV, were examined using the Likelihood Ratio Test (LRT). Results A total of 26,029 women aged 15-49 years, living with their partners and had a pregnancy outcome 2 years prior to the survey were included. Women justifying IPV were less likely to utilize contraceptive methods (aOR) = 0.86, 95% CI 0.84, 0.88), at-least one Antenatal Care (ANC) visit (aOR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.72, 0.88), four or more ANC services (aOR = 0.81, 95% CI 0.76, 0.86), institutional delivery (aOR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.80, 0.94) and Post-natal Care (aOR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.62, 0.95) services. A decreasing linear trend was observed for four or more ANC visits (LRT P = 0.96) and institutional delivery (LRT P = 0.80) with increasing levels of IPV justification. Women justifying IPV were less likely to have at least one ANC visit in urban (aOR 0.67, 95% CI 0.60, 0.75) compared to rural areas (aOR 0.83, 95% CI 0.73, 0.94). Conclusions Women's justification of IPV was associated with decreased odds of utilizing a wide range of maternal health care services at the regional level. Although further research that may help establish a causal link is important before formulating public health interventions, our study indicates interventions targeting women's condoning attitude toward IPV, delivered sooner rather than later, could potentially help to improve women's utilization of essential maternal health care services in the South Asian region that comprises Afghanistan, Bhutan, Nepal, and Pakistan.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available