4.5 Review

Impact of Ambulatory Setting for Workers' Compensation Patients Undergoing One-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Review of the Literature

Journal

WORLD NEUROSURGERY
Volume 167, Issue -, Pages E251-E267

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.07.136

Keywords

Inpatient; MCID; MIS-TLIF; Outpatient; PROM; WC; Workers? Compensation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared perioperative characteristics and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in workers' compensation patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) in either the inpatient or outpatient setting. The results showed that despite worse perioperative outcomes in multiple measures, the inpatient cohort (IC) showed improved PROMs from preoperative to 1-year follow-up visit, whereas the outpatient cohort (OC) had improvement with only VAS back and leg.
-OBJECTIVE: To compare perioperative characteristics and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in workers' compensation (WC) patients undergoing mini-mally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) in either the inpatient/outpatient setting. -METHODS: Patients with WC undergoing 1-level MIS-TLIF were included. Patients were separated into inpa-tient/outpatient groups and demographically propensity score matched. PROMs included visual analog scale (VAS) back/VAS leg/Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)/12-item Short Form Physical Composite Score (SF-12 PCS)/ Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) preoperatively and 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively. Results were compared preoperatively and postoperatively and between cohorts. Minimum clinically important dif-ference (MCID) achievement was determined through comparison with values established in the literature. -RESULTS: A total of 216 patients were included (184 inpatient). The inpatient cohort (IC) showed worse peri-operative outcomes in multiple measures (P < 0.034; all). The IC improved in all PROMs (P< 0.038; all), besides ODI at 6 weeks, SF-12 PCS at 6 weeks/6 months/1 year, and PROMIS-PF at 6 weeks. The outpatient cohort (OC) improved in VAS back at all time points and VAS leg at 6 months (P < 0.033; all). Between cohorts, the OC showed better scores with VAS leg/ODI/SF-12 PCS/PROMIS-PF at multiple time points (P< 0.031; all). Most of the IC achieved MCID, aside from ODI, whereas the OC achieved MCID in SF-12 PCS. MCID achievement between cohorts was higher in the IC at PROMIS-PF at 1 year and VAS back overall (P< 0.034; all). -CONCLUSIONS: Despite more comorbidities and worse perioperative measures, the IC showed improved PROMs from preoperative to double dagger 1 follow-up visit, whereas the OC had improvement with only VAS back and leg. The IC showed multiple MCID achievements, whereas the OC showed MCID in only SF-12 PCS. These findings may help guide a surgeon's decision making between inpatient/ outpatient lumbar surgery in the WC population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available