4.7 Article

Local retention efficacy of steroid-loaded PLGA microspheres in epidural injection

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-16359-0

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Mid-career Researcher Program through NRF - Korea government (MSIT) [NRF-2016R1A2B4010992]
  2. SNUBH Research Fund [13-2015-016]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the local retention of steroid-loaded PLGA microspheres in epidural injections using a rabbit model. The results showed that the PLGA group had higher steroid retention than the TA group in the first week after injection, but most of the steroids disappeared after 2 weeks in both groups.
Long-term effects of epidural steroid injections for pain management require novel drug formulations that increase tissue retention time. Present study aimed to investigate the local retention of steroid-loaded poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) microspheres in epidural injection using a rabbit model. Twenty rabbits were randomly assigned to a PLGA group (n = 10) and a triamcinolone acetonide (TA) group (n = 10). Each animal was injected with either TA-loaded PLGA microspheres or conventional TA suspension into the lumbar epidural space. The lumbar segments were then harvested from the sacrificed rabbits on day 1, week 1, 2, and 4 after the injection. On day 1, the residual steroid concentration (RSC) was lower in the PLGA group than in the TA group (5.03 ppm vs. 13.01 ppm). However, after a week, more steroids remained in the PLGA group (3.29 ppm vs. 0.58 ppm). After 2 weeks, fewer steroids remained in the PLGA group than in the TA group, although both contained less than 10% of the initial retention dose. This study shows that steroid-loaded PLGA tended to have higher steroid retention in tissue than the steroid itself at the first week after epidural injection. However, most of the steroids disappeared after 2 weeks in both groups.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available