Hydrologic regime alteration and influence factors in the Jialing River of the Yangtze River, China

Under the influence of climate alteration and human activities, the hydrological regime of rivers is changing dramatically, which has become a hot spot for water environment research. In this study, we quantitatively assessed the degree of hydrological variability of the Jialing River and the contribution of climate alteration and human activities to hydrological alterations using the ecohydrological indicator range of alteration (IHA-RVA) method and Budyko hypothesis formulations. The results showed that (1) The average annual runoff and the precipitation of Jialing River showed a decreasing trend, the potential evapotranspiration showed an increasing trend. (2) Compared with before the hydrological situation changed, the degree of alteration in the annual extreme streamflow is 31%, which is a low degree of alteration; the degree of alteration in monthly streamflow, annual extreme flow magnitude, extreme flow ephemeris, and streamflow alteration frequency are 51%, 43%, 54%, and 64% respectively, which are all moderate degrees of alteration; the overall hydrological alteration is 50%, which belongs to moderate alteration. (3) The contribution of precipitation, potential evapotranspiration, and human activities to the runoff alteration is 61%, - 16%, and 55%, respectively. This study provides corresponding references for ecological restoration and sustainable development of the Yangtze River Basin in China.

Automated summary

This study quantitatively assessed the hydrological variability of the Jialing River and the contribution of climate alteration and human activities to hydrological alterations using the IHA-RVA method and Budyko hypothesis formulations. The results showed a decreasing trend in average annual runoff and precipitation, as well as an increasing trend in potential evapotranspiration. The study also revealed a low to moderate degree of alteration in various hydrological indicators, with precipitation, potential evapotranspiration, and human activities contributing 61%, -16%, and 55% to the runoff alteration, respectively.