4.7 Article

Clinical exome sequencing for inherited retinal degenerations at a tertiary care center

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-13026-2

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of exome sequencing (ES) in the diagnosis of inherited retinal disorders. The results showed the clinical utility of ES in the diagnosis of genetically heterogeneous retinal disorders.
Inherited retinal degenerations are clinically and genetically heterogeneous diseases characterized by progressive deterioration of vision. This study aimed at assessing the diagnostic yield of exome sequencing (ES) for an unselected cohort of individuals with hereditary retinal disorders. It is a retrospective study of 357 unrelated affected individuals, diagnosed with retinal disorders who underwent clinical ES. Variants from ES were filtered, prioritized, and classified using the ACMG recommendations. Clinical diagnosis of the individuals included rod-cone dystrophy (60%), macular dystrophy (20%), cone-rod dystrophy (9%), cone dystrophy (4%) and other phenotypes (7%). Majority of the cases (74%) were singletons and 6% were trios. A confirmed molecular diagnosis was obtained in 24% of cases. In 6% of cases, two pathogenic variants were identified with phase unknown, bringing the potential molecular diagnostic rate to 30%. Including the variants of uncertain significance (VUS), potentially significant findings were reported in 57% of cases. Among cases with a confirmed molecular diagnosis, variants in EYS, ABCA4, USH2A, KIZ, CERKL, DHDDS, PROM1, NR2E3, CNGB1, ABCC6, PRPH2, RHO, PRPF31, PRPF8, SNRNP200, RP1, CHM, RPGR were identified in more than one affected individual. Our results support the utility of clinical ES in the diagnosis of genetically heterogeneous retinal disorders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available