4.7 Article

Using archaeological data for the understanding of Late-Holocene Sea of Galilee's level fluctuations

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-09768-8

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Avery-Tsui Foundation
  2. Hatter Foundation
  3. PEF Israel Endowment
  4. Thomas Morton of the Hyslop Shanon Foundation
  5. Foundation of Biblical Archaeology
  6. Shamir Research Institute in Katzrin
  7. Marie Sklodowska-Curie Action (European Union) [891230]
  8. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [891230] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study provides new data on the changes in the Sea of Galilee level and highlights the importance of water level fluctuations in the habitation pattern.
In the Jordan Valley, reconstructed changes of the Sea of Galilee level have shown sharp fluctuations of the water elevation during the Holocene. In this paper, we provide new data originating from the excavations of Kursi Beach archaeological site located on the eastern shore of the Sea of Galilee and compare them with other data gathered from the archaeological site of Magdala, located on its western shore. Our data yield to constrain Sea of Galilee level changes between the Iron Age II (10th-9th centuries BCE) and the Crusader period (11th-12th centuries CE), a period of high interest for the archaeological community. We demonstrate that water level was around -212 to -210 m mean sea level (msl) for the Iron Age II period. Lake level rose to -208/-209 m msl during the Late Hellenistic/Early Roman period. Water level remained low (<-213/-214 m msl) from the Byzantine to the Crusader period (from 5th to 12th centuries CE). Our data provide new knowledge for the understanding of variations in the Sea of Galilee level in antiquity. We highlight that water level fluctuations must have been key factors taken into account in the habitation pattern.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available