4.7 Article

Inter-individual differences in laboratory rats as revealed by three behavioural tasks

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-13288-w

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Czech Science Foundation [GACR 305/22-15096S, GACR 20-26831S]
  2. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of Czech Republic (ERDF/ESF project PharmaBrain) [CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_025/0007444]
  3. MH CZ-DRO (NUDZ) [00023752]
  4. [260571/SVV/2021]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study tested the repeatability of behavior in the Long Evans strain of laboratory rats and found stable inter-individual differences in behavior, but no evidence of a behavioral syndrome.
Stable inter-individual differences in behaviour and personality have been studied for several decades now. The aim of this study was to test the repeatability of behaviour of the Long Evans strain of laboratory rats in order to assess their inter-individual differences. Male laboratory rats (n = 36) were tested in a series of tasks (Open field test, Elevated plus maze test, and modified T-maze test) repeated over time to assess their personality traits. To evaluate the temporal stability of the behaviour, we calculated repeatability estimates of the examined traits. We also checked for a link in behavioural traits across these experiments, which would suggest the existence of a behavioural syndrome. We found stable inter-individual differences in behaviour. Interestingly, no link emerged between the tasks we studied and therefore we did not find support for a behavioural syndrome. The lack of behavioural correlations between these experiments suggests that the results derived from these tasks should be interpreted carefully, as these experiments may measure various behavioural axes. Moreover, the animals habituate to the apparatus. Consequently, behaviour in the Open field test and Elevated plus maze test is not fully consistent and repeatable across subsequent trials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available